nzLARPS on 20/20 - Oct 8th

Well that was fun.

I am beyond stoked I came out of it not looking like a pervert after the ad. We looked pretty good, albiet nerdy.

I really do think it’s time to redefine the term nerd or geek. It has been applied to us for such a long time now that I think it should be something of a badge of pride worn by the community. Like I said, we all have stories about being mocked for our choice in hobby and I think that has the potential to unite us a community. We are geeks, nerds or whatever but we are having a damn fun time doing it and if people are interested to look beyond their own preconceptions they may infact enjoy themselves like Hugh did.

Sorry for getting my nerd pride on.

No thanks. I don’t want a label, I’m just a guy who enjoys interactive fiction as well as the sort you read or watch. No-one has ever called me a geek or nerd that I recall, and I don’t identify with those perjorative terms.

The article somewhat exaggerated the silliness and cringe factor for laughs in the first two thirds with their editing, but they redeemed themselves somewhat by editing the last third to give it a sense of excitement and fun when the journalist played.

I give this article a “B”.

As articles about larp go it was better than average. They did their research, and they didn’t push a completely unwarranted angle. But it was on the tabloid side and the editorial story-telling was ham-fisted (“see how silly larp is. But, lo! Our journalist enjoys it!”), especially when exaggerating the silliness.

And the person who makes the trailers should be fired. :wink:

Aye through the website link, just watched here in the UK.
I doubt it will end up on TV.

Hope there are a number of newbies at the up coming games…

Yeah I was streaming it as soon as the links were up. I’m quite proud of everyone :slight_smile:

No thanks. I don’t want a label, I’m just a guy who enjoys interactive fiction as well as the sort you read or watch. No-one has ever called me a geek or nerd that I recall, and I don’t identify with those perjorative terms.

The article somewhat exaggerated the silliness and cringe factor for laughs in the first two thirds with their editing, but they redeemed themselves somewhat by editing the last third to give it a sense of excitement and fun when the journalist played.

I give this article a “B”.

As articles about larp go it was better than average. They did their research, and they didn’t push a completely unwarranted angle. But it was on the tabloid side and the editorial story-telling was ham-fisted (“see how silly larp is. But, lo! Our journalist enjoys it!”), especially when exaggerating the silliness.

And the person who makes the trailers should be fired. :wink:[/quote]

[quote=“Ryan Paddy”]A short list of things that look silly on camera:
[ul][li]Blurring the in-character and out-of-character, e.g. describing your character to the camera while speaking and acting in character (I’ve cringed at this in several pieces of UK media coverage)[/li]
[li]Discussing personal problems[/li]
[li]Getting really, really excited[/li]
[li]Taking it too seriously (the one I’m most guilty of)[/li][/ul][/quote]

:wink:

I think they did quite well. Everyone is by and large portrayed as being fairly normal, and LARPing itself is more made out to be something fun that people do to enjoy themselves, rather than some overbearingly “geek”-afflicted hobby, born from the dice-infested tables in locked basements…

[quote=“Anna K”]I already have email enquiries from people saw the article :smiley: :smiley: :smiley: :smiley: :smiley:[/quote]Awesome. If any of them are in Wellington, direct them to here.

The word from On High (ie my Mum) is that it was a good article and we looked like pretty normal people.

[quote=“Orlandus”]Well that was fun.

I am beyond stoked I came out of it not looking like a pervert after the ad. We looked pretty good, albiet nerdy.

I really do think it’s time to redefine the term nerd or geek. It has been applied to us for such a long time now that I think it should be something of a badge of pride worn by the community. Like I said, we all have stories about being mocked for our choice in hobby and I think that has the potential to unite us a community. We are geeks, nerds or whatever but we are having a damn fun time doing it and if people are interested to look beyond their own preconceptions they may infact enjoy themselves like Hugh did.

Sorry for getting my nerd pride on.[/quote]

I thought you were awesome! I’m curious to see if you get comments at your school now after this!

Everyone who spoke was articulate and came across really well. I posted the link here and one person in Washington state is already going to pass the link onto her group of players. community.livejournal.com/larpers/219877.html

Wow, that was actually a pretty good article. You really got a feel for the hobby, especially in the second half. There were quite a few funny moments, as well as some nice dramatic roleplaying.
Also, I can’t believe my face was just shown in National tv - I have to send the link to everyone I know!

Oh, and totally rocking the geek pride :slight_smile:

The overwhelming impression I got from this article was that this is fun. There were lots of shots of happy people in costume. The post game interviews with people with shining faces and big grins, that final montage of people having a really great time to some happy music, and I think the earnest enthusiasm of everyone they interviewed came through (except me, because I was trying to appear as the serious and respectable president and as a result I came across a little deadpan)

Personally, the angle I fear the most is “Crazy People Think They Really Are Spies/Heroes/Mages/Vampires/Whatever”, the one where people go “What’s wrong with you that you’re an adult and still play pretend?” so I was glad we were shown as obviously playing, obviously not taking ourselves deadly seriously. I don’t mind being perceived as someone who spends their weekend playing around and having a great time of it. I’d rather be thought of as silly than crazy :smiley:

I actually thought the article thoroughly undermined the “geek” stereotypes. Hamish was spouting his lines about socially dysfunctionally basement dwellers in a good humouredly mocking way - he was clearly including himself in those groups, when the article showed he was in fact an articulate adult with a proper respectable job. I also liked the fact that there was a good gender balance shown as well, “geek” is usually believed to be an exclusively male domain while in Auckland we are lucky to have a good gender balance, and the fact they had several women interviewees I think undermined the perception that a) this kind of stuff is only done by guys and b) that “geeks” wouldn’t know a girl if it bit them. I thought it was a clever angle of presenting the stereotypes, then undermining them, like the clip with Tigger in the tree: him going off about how silly and ridiuclous is all is, while dressed like a tree made of foam. Where what’s being said is contradicted by what is being shown. I also thought that including what people do for a day job was a good move too, and there was such a good variety - student, carer for the elderly, business, teacher, film and TV…a good mix of “normal” jobs.

(I went to such great effort to avoid using the word geek anywhere in my interviews, and the one single instance of it got used. Gah!!)

I liked the fact they showed how much creative and logistical work goes into all this, showing the logistics meeting and the writer’s meeting, which I think gives it a dimension of seriousness, i.e. we don’t just throw on our capes and run around in the park, that our hobby has considerably more creative direction and structure. The discussion of what it takes to write a 70 character theatreform I thought was a great addition.

My Dad saw and came online after to tell me he thought it was good, though he did say he already knew heaps of stuff about larp from listening to me for years, so he wasn’t sure how it would look to complete strangers.

Meanwhile, over on Facebook, people I went to high school with are telling me how cool the article is :laughing:

I just watched this again online, and I liked it much better the second time.

I may be willing to upgrade them to a B+ or A-, if 20/20 comes here and asks nicely. :wink:

Gives me an idea…hey Hamish, how do you feel about taking a stack of fliers to school for when people ask on Monday? :laughing:

Might be kind of seen as a conflict of interest? Here at least there are rules about what sorts of things can be handed out at schools and by whom.

Back to Anna’s earlier post: I also appreciated the “behind the scenes” shots. I’m quite impressed by this crew and all the care and effort they obviously went to in putting this thing together.
Although I’m not sure I would have ended it with the chopping off someone’s wing and screaming. That was a little weird.

Yeah, I was mostly kidding…

I just did a re-watch. Still pleased. A few things could have been better but overall, I am still very happy… lack of contact details was a bit of a downpoint though… unless they had them at the end programme?

I had good feedback from my workmates, as did Dave. Plus one of my friends from highschool commented on facebook.

Nope. I think the idea is that they did the story on the hobby and community, not promoting our event or society, if that makes sense. “Unbranded” larp, if you will.

Don’t they usually have contact details in the closing credits of the show?

Gives me an idea…hey Hamish, how do you feel about taking a stack of fliers to school for when people ask on Monday? :laughing:[/quote]

I am going to look like an utter idiot at school for a few days, might want to hold off on the fliers for a short while. And by a short while I mean, eternity.

I am still not sure at the root of peoples aversion to the term ‘geek’. Sure it has been used in a primarily pejorative sense like you say Ryan but terms have the meanings we give them and I think if we choose something positive and embrace the label then it loses some of the negative connotations. Just my thoughts though and each to their own.

Agree %100 on the person who does the ads though :slight_smile:. Unless it was Cara, we like her.

I’m not comfortable with the suggestion of trying to redefine geek / nerd.

Its one thing to call yourself that in like company and bandy it about, but being called that by outsiders feels wrong.

Liken it to the terms Fag and Nigger. Though people might use those terms in like company about each other, do any of you believe that those would be appropriate to use if you’re not like company?