Firstly I would like to apologise for my first post. I had been having a bad day and it does not accurately portray my thoughts and feelings on the subject. Ryan and Mike I appreciate your discussion on such a charged matter.
I would also firstly, when I refer to political correctness I refer in particular to an event when at a business meeting, a member of my family along with everyone else of European descent was required (at risk of losing their job if they didnt, I might add) to stand up and formally apologise to the maori members of the group for New Zealand’s colonial past. I don’t know how that makes anyone else feel, but I don’t think it’s right that people should be made to feel guilty and apologise for something they did not do. I realise events such as this are exceptions rather then the norm, I just want to point out that they do sometimes happen and I disagree with them when they do
Secondly, Maori is far from the only language in the world where an attempt has been made to systematically beat it out and at present there are more then 270 languages classified as endangered. My great Grandparents, both spoke Gaelic as their first language and at various points in their lives were punished for speaking it, and for a while the language was in danger of extinction. I am not mentioning this to belittle, or justify the suppression of maori culture, I am simply pointing out that it is a sad occurrence that happens the world over and something I have personal though indirect experience of, as my great Grandparents were the last Gaelic speakers in our family.
Thirdly, my claim that maori cullture was forced upon me comes from the fact that during intermediate and my first years of high school Maori studies were compulsory for all students. This was a subject I did not find personally relevant, not because I regarded the subject matter as boring or Trivial, but simply because I would have preferred to use the time to study my own roots and heritage. This is not to say that either topic is more intrinsically valuable or important then the other, simply that they have different levels of meaniong to me as Iam sure they do to you. I resented the fact I was not given a choice in the matter and regretably this has soured my desire to further study the subject. I should also note at this point that if I seem as though I am claiming that my culture is not represented adequately in N.Z. society, it is because I do not personally identify myself with Pakeha or NZ European culture. I think of myself as Gaelic in origin and as such do not find myself adequately represented within New Zealand Bi-Culturalism as I am invariably grouped with a culture I do not recognise as my own.
My objection to the use of a maori name for the newsletter was and remains simply that I do not feel it accurately reflects the content or purpose of the newsletter. The purpose being in my mind not just to inform members of the society about upcoming events and happenings within NZLARPs but also as a tool by which we can reach out to the broader community and gather new members into the fold. With this in mind, I just think a name like ‘Tuakoi’ is too distinct from the rest of NZLARPs’ branding to effectively fill this role.
As an aside, what Maori specific content would you like to see on Diatribe, Mike? I’m genuinely curious