Firstly, I agree with Craig’s assessment and recommendations. I know what it’s like to work on a publication whilst under pressure, so I would like to commend the team for their efforts and for taking on board the constructive criticism.
The purpose of the newsletter is at the crux of questions of content, editorial style, issue scheduling and budgeting. Furthermore, the purpose is necessarily informed by the relationship between the newsletter and the nzLARPS web presences (nzLARPS website, diatribe), the intended readership, and the desired actions (if any) resulting from the newsletter being read.
I’m not convinced that Anna’s purpose is entirely cognisant of the above factors.
Print is a static medium. Once an issue is published, it will not change. This makes it particularly suited to expressing historical events, and unsuited to handling dynamic topics (such rules that are under development).
The web presences are dynamic, so it would be useful if the newsletter was designed to draw readers in and motivate them connect with our dynamic publications.
Although this is a decision for the committee, here’s my vision:
-
The newsletter acts as a portal into historical and future larps that were/will be held by nzLARPS (reviews, development updates, satire, guides, advice, histories etc)
-
Although there will be a consistent meta-style for the newsletter, each article will be styled to convey the setting of the larp that is being discussed.
-
There will be “links” to appropriate online references (diatribe, nzlarps.org etc) i.e. website addresses
-
A lot of content that is not already online. While I expect that the newsletter will be ultimately available online in PDF format, we could delay this for say, a couple of weeks, to give the newsletter some prominence.
-
A calendar of planned events, listing events planned for the next few months, with more links.
LaTex is a very powerful tool, but it is aimed at computer science undergraduates. It is closer to a markup language than a word processor. Although Word is lots of limitations, it would be easier to keep using Word because it is more ubiquitous and relatively easy to learn.
